Skip to content

Remove duplicate SetFDP function definitiontest#9

Open
Yaqin23 wants to merge 2 commits intoPrecogs-fix-ak6y2nivfrom
Yaqin23-patch-1
Open

Remove duplicate SetFDP function definitiontest#9
Yaqin23 wants to merge 2 commits intoPrecogs-fix-ak6y2nivfrom
Yaqin23-patch-1

Conversation

@Yaqin23
Copy link

@Yaqin23 Yaqin23 commented Mar 5, 2026

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Yaqin <135983909+Yaqin23@users.noreply.github.com>
@precogs-ai
Copy link

precogs-ai bot commented Mar 5, 2026

👋 Precogs AI is reviewing this Pull Request

⏳ Scan is in progress…
We’ll update this PR with findings shortly.

— Precogs AI 🤖

@precogs-ai
Copy link

precogs-ai bot commented Mar 5, 2026

🛡️ Precogs AI Security Review

Looks like our code is playing with fire — let’s extinguish those flames before they blaze out of control!
🔍 Total | 🚨 Critical/High | ⚠️ Medium | 💡 Low

  User Input ──▶ [Unsanitized] ──▶ gFDP ──▶ 💥 Crash / RCE
🚨 #1. Unvalidated Global Pointer Assignment in C++ — Risk: High ⚡ Score: 9.8

🎯 TL;DR: Directly assigning user-controlled pointers can lead to crashes and security issues.

🔍 The Problem:
The code assigns a raw pointer from user input directly to a global variable without any checks. This oversight can lead to significant issues, such as NULL dereferences and potential memory corruption. If an attacker controls the input, they could wreak havoc!

📍 Vulnerable Code:

1  // Global variable declaration
2  gFDP = fuzzed_data_provider;

💣 How an Attacker Exploits This:

Call SetFDP(nullptr) or pass a pointer to a freed object: e.g.
  FuzzedDataProvider *p = new FuzzedDataProvider(...);
  delete p;
  SetFDP(p);

By passing a null pointer or a pointer to freed memory, the program will crash or behave unexpectedly, potentially compromising the entire application.

✅ The Fix:

#include <cstdio>

void SetFDP(FuzzedDataProvider *fuzzed_data_provider) {
  if (fuzzed_data_provider == nullptr) {
    // PRECOGS_FIX: reject null pointer inputs to avoid later NULL dereference
    std::fprintf(stderr, "SetFDP: rejected null fuzzed_data_provider\n");
    return;
  }

  // PRECOGS_FIX: basic validation performed above; assign only a non-null pointer
  gFDP = fuzzed_data_provider;
}

📊 Details:

Metric Value
CWE CWE-822
CVSS 9.8
Confidence Likely

Remember, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure!
🛡️ Scanned by Precogs AI — Your AI security co-pilot

Signed-off-by: Yaqin <135983909+Yaqin23@users.noreply.github.com>
@precogs-ai
Copy link

precogs-ai bot commented Mar 5, 2026

👋 Precogs AI is reviewing this Pull Request

⏳ Scan is in progress…
We’ll update this PR with findings shortly.

— Precogs AI 🤖

@precogs-ai
Copy link

precogs-ai bot commented Mar 5, 2026

🛡️ Precogs AI Security Review

Looks like our code is feeling pretty secure—maybe it should take up a new hobby! 🚀
🔍 Total | 🚨 Critical/High | ⚠️ Medium | 💡 Low

Summary of Findings

  • Total Vulnerabilities: 1
  • Critical: 0
  • High: 0
  • Medium: 0
  • Low: 0
🚨 #1. None in C++ — Risk: None ⚡ Score: 0.0

🎯 TL;DR: Your code is safe—no vulnerabilities found!

🔍 The Problem:
No exploitable vulnerabilities were detected in the provided C++ code snippet. The function trigger_double_free smartly avoids double-free issues, while SetFDP acts as a simple setter without any direct vulnerabilities. However, remember that usage context might introduce race conditions.

📍 Vulnerable Code:

1  #include <cstddef>
2  
3  // Forward declaration for the fuzzing data provider type used by callers.
4  class FuzzedDataProvider;
5  
6  // Global pointer used by the rest of the program. Keep as-is to preserve API.
7  static FuzzedDataProvider *gFDP = nullptr;
8  
9  static void trigger_double_free() {
10     // Example implementation that avoids double free
11     int* ptr = new int(42); // Allocate memory
12     delete ptr;             // Free memory
13     ptr = nullptr;          // Avoid dangling pointer in this scope
14 }
15 
16 void SetFDP(FuzzedDataProvider *fuzzed_data_provider) {
17   gFDP = fuzzed_data_provider;
18 }

💣 How an Attacker Exploits This:

None — no plausible exploit from the shown code alone.

No attack scenario exists since the code does not present any vulnerabilities.

✅ The Fix:

#include <cstddef>

// Forward declaration for the fuzzing data provider type used by callers.
class FuzzedDataProvider;

// Global pointer used by the rest of the program. Keep as-is to preserve API.
static FuzzedDataProvider *gFDP = nullptr;

static void trigger_double_free() {
    // Example implementation that avoids double free
    int* ptr = new int(42); // Allocate memory
    delete ptr;             // Free memory
    ptr = nullptr;          // Avoid dangling pointer in this scope
}

void SetFDP(FuzzedDataProvider *fuzzed_data_provider) {
  gFDP = fuzzed_data_provider;
}

📊 Details:

Metric Value
CWE None
CVSS 0.0
Confidence Certain

"Security is not a product, but a process."
🛡️ Scanned by Precogs AI — Your AI security co-pilot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant